In " Service Learning, " Antonelli and Thompson describe
the state role for service learning as providing a clearinghouse for
information about model programs and materials, acting as a catalyst
for developing networks, promoting and "sustaining communication
among individuals as well as evaluators, policymakers, and researchers."
If the state's role increases from simply service learning to P-16+
service learning, then a number of new dimensions enter the picture.
First, the efforts from the state level must be collaborative between
all levels of education and they must be inclusive from two perspectives;
the formal system of education and lifelong service learning.
The formal system of education and its P-16 components are well described
in the P-16 links. A seamless system of education means stronger ties
between all levels of education. Lifelong service learning includes
individuals of all ages who are learning as they serve. Lifelong service
learning is a "womb to the tomb" concept, that is, all ages
can be involved. A last concept is intergenerational service learning
which includes older adults and youngsters learning together as they
serve.
In Illinois, the work at the state level has been accomplished through
an informal coalition led by the Illinois Board of Higher Education
and including the Illinois Community College Board, the State Superintendent,
and the Deputy Governor for Education. An informal task force was
convened in the fall of 1999 to begin to discuss a P-16+ service-learning
initiative for the state. The task force conducted a survey, shared
information, and planned the first formal P-16+ Service-Learning
meeting that was held in August of 2000.
Purpose of the first P-16+ Service Learning Meeting