HOW TO IDENTIFY
RARE AND ENDANGERED FERNS AND FERN ALLIES
A. Benniamin, V. Irudayaraj* and
V. S. Manickam
*Department of Plant
Biology and Biotechnology,
Centre for Biodiversity and
Biotechnology,
St. Xavier’s College (Autonomous),
Palayamkottai,
Tamil
e- mail: fernsbenni@yahoo.co.in
Received
ABSTRACT
Identification
of rare and endangered plant species is the first requirement for any
conservation programme. The IUCN guideline is the only available method to
identify the rare and endangered species and it requires vast data on the wild
population of the target species. None of the biological characters, which are
playing main role in the survival and distribution of several species, is used
in IUCN guideline. In the meantime there are several difficulties in following
IUCN guideline, particularly the non availability of complete field data.
Moreover, the same guideline can not be used for all the groups of species in equal
importance. The vascular cryptogams, pteridophytes, are also an important
component of any mountainous flora and they have also to be conserved in
nature. As they are the primitive vascular plants on the earth, they are
getting depleted in the flora due to various reasons and it is the right time
to identify the rare and endangered pteridophytes to conserve them. By
considering various difficulties of IUCN method for the identification rare and
endangered pteridophytes, a very simple method has been adopted by using just
four criteria and this method can be applied to Pteridophytes from any region
of the world.
Keywords: Conservation, Rare and Endangered ferns, Identification.
“Ferns in art convey the idea of solitary humility,
frankness and sincerity, because they conceal
their grace and beauty in forest depth”
INTRODUCTION
Plants are the foundation of all life on
earth, without which we cannot survive.
IUCN Red List shows the number of threatened
vascular plant species recorded for each country. A high figure of threatened species for a
particular country, like 29% in
According to IUCN Red List, out of 511
families of vascular plants currently recognized, 372 of these contain globally
threatened and /or extinct species. Not
surprisingly, the largest families also contain the largest numbers of
threatened species. Excluding nineteen
threatened monotypic families (only one species in the family, and thus 100
percent threatened), there are 20 plant families with at least 50 percent of
their species threatened. Of these,
eight are gymnosperm families (including cycads and conifers). The prominence of gymnosperms may be due to
one or more factors: 1. They are a well known and relatively small group; 2.
Many gymnosperm species are widely exploited both for timber and horticultural
purposes; 3. Gymnosperms are an ancient group of species, and may not adapt
easily to the rapidly changing environment around them. In contrast, the ferns as a group appear to
face relatively low levels of threat.
This may be due in part to the efficiency with which fern spores are
dispersed. At the same time, fern
species have not been fully assessed, so their status as a group is not
entirely clear. With this background it
was planned to assess the Indian Pteridophytes, by selecting the Pteridophytes
of the
METHODOLOGY
Several
methods, including the typical method adopted by IUCN, were tried to identify
the rare and endangered Pteridophytes of the
For the successful establishment of a plant
species in an ecosystem, the species should reproduce successfully through
vegetative or sexual method by producing fertile and viable seeds /
spores. It needs specific and suitable
ecological niche to establish itself successfully. In the meantime they should have the capacity
to colonise a particular ecological niche easily and in general they should
have good genetical make up. As far as
ferns are concerned the species with erect rhizome could not colonise a place
easily when compared to the species with creeping rhizome. In general polyploid species are more
tolerable than the diploid species. In
evolution polyploidization is usually accomplished with the property of
vegetative reproduction (
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
With this context the key factors,
particularly biological factors, such as rhizome type (erect or creeping),
ploidy level (diploid or polyploid), nature of the spores (chlorophyllous or
achlorophyllous) and ecological factor such as habitats, (epiphyte / lithophyte
or terrestrial), responsible for the rarity of ferns and fern allies were
identified and applied for the assessment of rare and endangered ferns and fern allies of the Western Ghats
along with other criteria followed by Perring and Farrell ( 1977). As far as ferns are concerned each and every
species will score equally when we give the threat value for each criterion mentioned
by Perring and Farrell like economical value, accessibility of the species
etc. Because all the ferns are having at
least some economical values and most of the ferns are growing in forest
interior and it is very difficult for access.
So it is very difficult to differentiate a rare and common fern when
they score more or less same range of threat values. The application of the above biological
criteria gave meaningful results and when they are applied separately they give
more or less the same kind of results.
So, for the present analysis only these criteria were used (Fig.1). It is a very simple method based on only five
criteria and the successfulness of this method has also been tested for ferns
from other geographical regions (
The validity of the present method has also
been tested with the Himalayan ferns. In the first volume of “An Illustrated Flora
of Western Himalaya” by Khullar (1994) totally 190 species of ferns
have been described along with information on cytology, distribution and ecology.
By applying the present method, all the 190 species have been categorized into
different ranks. Thus the number of species belonging to each rank in the order
of first rank to the last rank has been given in table 2. Manickam (1995) has
also enumerated 46 rare and endangered ferns of the Western Ghats of South
India, based on his own field experience for about thirty years. The species
included in that list has also come under any one of the threat category of the
present study and thus it is of more value. But the problem is those who want
to identify a rare and endangered species for conservation purpose, he may not
have such a kind of experience and he has to depend on either the ready made
list or the scientific method to identify such species easily.
Few examples may be cited to test the
validity of the present method. The diploid fern Grammitis medialis with
erect rhizome, chlorophyllous spores and epiphyte/ lithophyte habitat belonging
to the first category has been recorded from only two localities from the
In contrast, the tetraploid, terrestrial fern
Christella parasitica with short or long-creeping rhizome, achlorophyllous
spores belonging to the last category is the most common fern in
The diploid epiphytic fern Ctenopteris subfalcata
with sub-erect rhizome and chlorophyllous spores belonging to the first
category has been recorded from only two localities from the
The advantage of the present method is not
only the easy one but also a more accurate method to choose the species for
conservation among closely related species. On the other hand there are some
minor problems which may be solved by taking little more scientific efforts.
For example, cytological data may not be available for some species. This can
be done if fresh specimens are available. In the present study chromosome
number (n= 80 ) for Tectaria zeilanica
has been reported for the first time from India ( Fig 3-d )In those cases of
species, where only herbarium specimens are available, the ploidy level may be
determined based on the size of the spores and (or) stomatal guard cell in
comparison with the other related species. The presence of more than one
cytotype within a species will result in little more problems to consider the
species as a whole or as a diploid one or polyploid one. In such cases the priority should be given to
the diploid cytotype of the species.
SUGGESTION
OF METHODS FOR CONSERVATION
As in any conservation strategies, in the
cases of ferns also, the best method of conserving the species is by in situ
conservation by protecting the natural habitats particularly in ever green
forests where they grow commonly. Some
cases may require ex situ conservation either by multiplying species by
conventional method or by in vitro tissue culture or spore culture
method. Such multiplied species may be
conserved in the garden. As far as
The purpose of the present paper is to expose
the rare and endangered ferns to the conservationists who are interested in
conserving the rare and endangered ferns through in vitro tissue culture
or spore culture. Usually they choose
the species, for such conservation measures, without making serious efforts to
identify the rare and endangered ferns.
Some times they wrongly choose some of the common species even with the
availability of the rare species. In
Table 1: List of endangered taxa from the
1. Adiantum
lomesam Nayar
& Geevar.
2. Alsophilla
nilgirensisHolttum
var.lobatus Manick. & Irud.
3. Ampelopteris
prolifera
(Retz.) Copel.
4. Anemia
wightiana Gard.
5. Anisocampium
cumingianum
Presl.
6. Asplenium
affine Sw.
7. Athyrium
solenopteris var pusillum (Kunze)
8. Cheilanthes
rufa D.Don.
9. Ctenopteris
subfalcata (Bl.)
Kunze.
10. Dicranopteris
taiwanensis Ching
et Chiou
11. Dryopteris
approximata
Sledge
12. Grammitis
attenuata Kze.
13. Grammitis
medialis
(Baker.) Sledge
14. Helminthostachys
zeylanica (L.)Hook.
15. Huperzia
hamiltonii
(Spring)Trev.
16. Huperzia
hilliana (Nessel)
Holub.
17. Huperzia
squarrosa (G.Forst.)
Trev.
18. Hypodematium
crenatum
(Forssk.)Kuhn
19. Lindsaea
malabarica
(Bedd.)Bak.
20. Lycopodium
japonicum Thunb.
21. Phanerophlebia
caryotidea var. caryotidea (Wall.ex.Hook & Grev.) Copel.
22. Phymatosorus
malabaricus
(Nayar & Geevar.) Geevar.ex Nampy ex Madhus.
23. Polystichum
subinerme
(Kze.) Fras. –Jenk.
24. Polystichum tacticopterum (Kunze) T.Moore
25. Prosaptia
obliquata
(Bl.)Mett.
26. Pteris
wallichiana Agardh.
27. Selaginella
microdendron
Bak.
28. Tectaria
periya Nayar
& Geevar.
29. Tectaria
zeilanica
(Holtt.) Sledge.
30. Trichomanes vamana Hameed & Madhus.
Table : 2 List of Endangered taxa from
1.
A. bullatum Wall. ex Mett.
2.
A. lingtaulensis Ching
3.
A. nesii Christ.
4.
A. tenuicaule Hayata.
5.
A. tenuifolium D.Don.
6.
A. wallichiana (Spreng.) Ching
7.
Adiantum
edgeworthii Hooker.
8.
Arthromeris
lehmanii (Mett.) Ching.
9.
Asplenium
anogrammoides Christ.
10.
Botrychium lanuginosum
(L.) Swartz. var. onondagense (underwood) House
11.
B. multifidum (Gmelin) Ruprecht.
12.
B. ternatum (Thunb.) Swartz.
13.
B. lunaria
(L.) Swartz.
14.
Cheilanthes dubia
Hope.
15.
C. duthiei Baker.
16.
C. persica (Bory) Mett. ex Kuhn.
17.
C. chrysophylla Hooker.
18.
C. anceps Blanford.
19.
Colysis pothifolia (Ham. ex D. Don)
H. Ito.
20.
Cryptogramma brunoniana Wall. ex Hooker et Greville.
21.
Dennstaedtia
wilfordii (
22.
D. scabra Wall. ex
23.
Dicranopteris
linearis var. subferruginea (Hieron.)
Nakai.
24.
Drynaria tibetica Ching et Wu.
25.
Lepisorus
clathratus (Clarke) Ching.
26.
L. contortus (Christ) Ching.
27.
L. oligolepidus (Baker) Ching.
28.
L. bicolor Ching
29.
Loxogramme
parallela Copel.
30.
Osmunda japonica
Thunb.
31.
O. regalis L.
32.
O. claytoniana L.
33.
Pellea
subfurfuracea (Hooker) Ching.
34.
P. hastata (Thunb.) Prantl.
35.
Phymatopteris
erythrocarpa (Mett. ex Kuhn) Pichi -Sermolli
36.
Pteris wallichiana Agardh
37.
Pyrrosia costata (Wall. ex Presl)
Tagawa et Iwatsuki.
38.
Woodsia andersonii (Beddome) Christ
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Authors are thankful to Rev. Dr. A.
Antonysamy S.J., the Principal, St. Xavier’s College, Palayamcottai for his
encouragements. Dr. A. Benniamin is thankful to the financial assistance
received from the Department of Science and Technology Government of India,
through the Young Scientist award.
REFERENCES
Theuerkauf, W.D. 1994 Preserving south Indian Pteridophytes. J.
Archives. Vol. 2(3). 4-8.
Bakgh – Comeau.Y. S. 1999 Risk
indexing rating of threatened ferns in
Zajac. A and Zajac. 1995
Eds., Distribution Atlas of Vascular plants in
Irudayaraj,V. Manickam,V.S. and Johnson, M. 2003. Vivipary,
a rare and evolutionary important phenomenon in a rare homosporous fern Grammitis
medialis from the
Perring, F.H. and Farrell,L. 1977. British Red data Books: Vascular plants,
SPNC, Nettleham, Lincoln,
Khullar S.P. 1994. An illustrated Fern flora of Western
Himalaya Vol. 1 & II International Book Distributors, Dehradun.
Manickam V.S. 1995 Rare and endangered ferns of the Western
Ghats of South India, Fern Gaz. 15:1-
10.
Manickam V.S and Irudayaraj V. 1992 Pteridophyte flora of
Western Ghats of South India. B.I.Publication,
Khare P.B. Raza F. and Kaur S. 1989
Propagation of fern through spores Ind. Fern. Jl. 6: 247 -250
Fig.
1. Key for the identification of rare and endangered ferns and fern allies
ENDANGERED
![]()
Chlorophyllous spores
![]()
![]()
![]()
Diploid
Achlorophyllous spores
![]()
![]()
Rhizome erect
VULNERABLE
![]()
Chlorophyllous spores
![]()
![]()
Polyploid
Achlorophyllous spores
Ferns and Fern allies

![]()
Chlorophyllous spores
![]()
![]()
![]()
Diploid
RARE
![]()
Achlorophyllous spores


![]()
Chlorophyllous spores
![]()
Polyploid
COMMON
![]()
Achlorophyllous spores

