|
Ethnobotanical
Leaflets 10: 1-12. 2006. Determination
of Essential Oil Content of Wild Olive and Its Comparison With Olive Oil M. Gulfraz1,
R. Parveen2, Y. Musseddque3, U.Nisar4, M.
Ithisham5 and 2,4,5,6M.
Sc research students, Issued 6 January 2006 Abstract Olive
oil is a natural fruit, product of fine aroma, pleasant taste and has high
nutritional values. Olive oil is
considered as most useful edible oil in the world due to its nutrient
contents and well tolerated by the stomach. Olive oil provides beneficial
effects against ulcer, gastritis and colon cancer. It is composed of
triglycerides, free fatty acids hydrocarbons, antioxidants and flavor
compounds. In the present study we report new edible oil extracted from fruit
of wild olive (Olea cuspedata).
Samples of olive fruits were collected from hilly areas of Kotli Sattian, (District Rawalpindi) and were analyzed to evaluate quantity and
quality of this newly extracted olive oil.
Results indicates that concentration level of oil in the fruits of wild olive (34.11-36.69%) , oleic acid (61.86-66.37%),
linoleic acid (20.19-21.6%), linoenic
acid (1.36-1.59%), polyphenol (344.07-352.86 mg/kg
), peroxides( 7.66-8.32 meqO2/kg) and acidity (0.47-0.98 meqO2/kg
) was found. The level of these components was comparable with the level
obtained from the fruits of cultivated olive and standard values reported for
olive oil in the literature. Therefore it was observed that quality of new
olive oil obtained from fruits of wild
olive was comparable with olive oil (available in market ) consumed by human
population through out world. It is expected that this new oil will
economically cheaper as compared to edible oils available in the market. This
study will not only help to improve the nutritional values of existing oils
but also provide oil with lower coast. Key words: Wild olive, olive, essential oils. Introduction The olive
is a member of the family Oleaceae, which comprises
of thirty species such as wild olive, jasmine, ash, lilac and privet etc. The
well known species is Olea europaea,
which is cultivated for its plump, fleshy, oil containing fruits. There are
1000 varieties including Olea cuspedate, wild species found in forest of
subcontinents and included in the World Catalogue of Olive (IOOC, 2004). In There are about 8.7 million hectares (21.5million acres)
supporting a total of almost 750million olive trees in 33 countries of the
world. The Basically olive oil
is a natural juice which preserves the taste, aroma, vitamins and properties
of the olive fruit. There are at least 4 types of olive oil (i) Extra virgin
oil, considered to best least processed from olive fruits (ii) Virginal
oil, obtained from the second
pressing (iii) Pure oil, obtained
from processing such as littering (iv) Extra
light oil, under goes considerable processing. Olive oil is a complex
compounds made of fatty acids, vitamins, volatile compounds, soluble
components and microscopic bits of olive. However, it was reported elsewhere
that olive oil contained oleic acid between 83% of all fatty acids. The free
acidity values must be less than 0.8%, where as polyphenols
(responsible for oil
taste) concentration > 200 and < 500 mg/kg. The peroxides
level must be 12 meqo2 /kg,
however, extra virgin olive oil must have high contents of polyphenols and oleic acids but peroxides concentration
and free acidity level will be low. Nutritionally olive oil contained
healthful fats that may provide 120 calories per tablespoon (nine calories per
gram) to the human body after digestion. However, it was suggested that fats
should not constitute more than 30 percent of daily caloric intake.
Furthermore it was reported by some scientist that olive oil is free of
cholesterol and do not have adverse effects on human body. Therefore in order
to increase the number of edible oil and reduce the prices of oils in the
markets. It is essential that new raw
material should be identified. Some of wild material has potential to
increase oil production, so need is to develop new and improved olive
cultivars based on selection and oil analysis ( Sedgley,
2000 ) The wild materials found in the surrounding areas of Rawalpindi/ Islamabad is not present being used for any
purposes. While million and million tones of the fruit of wild olive (Olea cuspedate)
is going to waste every year. Wood of this plant is being used for domestic
purposes which are not affected by insect or termites up to 100 years. Keeping in the view the facts given
above present study was undertaken with following aim and objectives: i. To evaluate the quality of edible oil in fruit of
wild olive (Olea cuspedate )
ii. To assess the level of oleic, linolecic, linolenic acids and
other parameters in the fruits of wild and cultivated olive. iii. To compare the levels of these
essential components in edible oils iv. To assess the economical values
of new edible oil Materials
and Methods
In
order to explore new sources of edible oil, the present study was conducted
to evaluate the quantity and quality of oil in fruit of wild olive and its
comparison with cultivated olive oil consume by public as edible oil. Samples
of the ripe fruits of wild olive (Olea cuspedata, locally known as Kaho)
were collected from hilly areas of Kotli Sattian, District, Collection of Samples Seventy five samples of wild olive seeds were collected
from 75 wild olive plants (Olea cuspedata) from 5 different locations of uniform type
of hilly areas. Total 50 grams of fresh fruits (per tree) were collected in
the fine plastic bags dully labeled with sample numbers, date and code of
locations. Similarly 15 samples of cultivated olive fruit were purchased from
markets of Preparation of Samples Fruit
samples of wild olive and olive were subjected to sun dried for a week followed
by oven drying at 105 °C for 24 hours. The dried fruits were grounded in to
powder form. Total 2 grams of fruit sample and added 100 ml of petroleum
ether were boiled for 4 hours in soxhlet apparatus
for collection of ether extract of these materials (Frank, 1986; Guind et al.2003).
After evaporation of solvent crude oil was obtained and percentage of oil in
fruit of wild olive and cultivated olive was calculated separately. Calibration Curve Suitable amounts of
oil samples were dissolved in Tetrahydrofuran (THF)
to give a final concentration of 5 mg/ml and 20 µl of
solution was injected in the gas chromatography system. The calibration curve
of the standards was obtained by dissolving a suitable amount of polystyrene mixture
in 1 ml THF to obtain the concentration of 0.15%. The solution was injected
to the Gc system. Three different standards of
polystyrene mixtures of varying molecular weight were used. Chromatography Analysis The
elution protocol was design to achieve adequate separation of fatty acids
like oleic linoleic, linolenic
acids within a reasonable length of time. THF was used as the eluent at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Compounds were
detected using the UV and RI detectors. Identification based on spectral
characteristic of compounds. Percentage composition of essential fatty acids
(oleic, linoleic and linoleic
acids) were determined by using gas chromatographic analysis as explained by
(Satyabrata et
al. 1998; Sedgley, 2000 ).
Furthermore for fatty acids methyl esters was prepared and analyzed by
capillary column gas chromatography was carried out. Identification of Peaks The order
in which the fatty acid methyl esters appear on the chromatogram was taken as
direct function of carbon atoms. The unsaturated esters were eluted after the
corresponding esters and their elution was direct function of the number of
double bonds. Mostly trans fatty
acids esters are eluted before the corresponding cis isomer. Therefore
individual methyl esters were then identified by their retentions times and
comparing the peaks with the peaks obtained for standards. Quantitative analysis The
percentage of each fatty acid was calculated from the ratio of the area under
the corresponding peak to the sum of the areas under all the Further more the level of Polyphenol in the
fruits of wild olive and olive was determined by using the method of
Singleton et al.1999.Where as free
acidity level and peroxides concentration was determined by using the method
reported by RESULTS
|
|
Sample No. |
Weight of sample (gram) |
Percent (%) of total Oil |
Percent (%) of Oleic acid |
Percent (%) of Linoleic acid |
Percent (%) of Linolenic acid |
Polyphenol ( mg/kg) |
Peroxydes meqO2/kg |
Acidity meqO2/kg |
Acidity meqO2/kg |
|
1 |
2 |
34.1 |
82.1 |
11.4 |
1.2 |
250 |
10.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
|
2 |
2 |
34.8 |
65.2 |
22.9 |
2.0 |
260 |
9.8 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
|
3 |
2 |
35.1 |
66.5 |
23.1 |
1.8 |
270 |
11.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
4 |
2 |
36.8 |
64.6 |
31.4 |
1.1 |
308 |
9.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
|
5 |
2 |
37.1 |
74.7 |
25.3 |
1.2 |
351 |
8.5 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
6 |
2 |
38.2 |
65.7 |
15.2 |
1.7 |
340 |
7.1 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
|
7 |
2 |
39.1 |
67.1 |
22.1 |
1.9 |
368 |
8.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
|
8 |
2 |
38.4 |
68.2 |
21.8 |
2.3 |
369 |
7.5 |
0.6 |
1.3 |
|
9 |
2 |
39.4 |
69.4 |
20.1 |
2.6 |
370 |
8.5 |
0.4 |
1 .7 |
|
10 |
2 |
37.8 |
67.8 |
22.1 |
1.2 |
358 |
5.6 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
|
11 |
2 |
39.4 |
59.4 |
23.4 |
1.8 |
450 |
3.5 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
|
12 |
2 |
28.2 |
61.6 |
19.4 |
1.6 |
370 |
5.5 |
0.4 |
1.5 |
|
13 |
2 |
35.1 |
57.3 |
17.3 |
0.8 |
450 |
7.8 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
|
14 |
2 |