K.N. Reddy1 and C. Sudhakar Reddy2
1Plant Taxonomy Division, Laila
Impex Research Centre, Jawahar Autonagar,
2Forestry
and Ecology Division, National Remote Sensing Agency, Balanagar,
E-mail: drsudhakarreddy@gmail.com
Received
26 February 2008
The
present article is based on the First Conservation Assessment and Management
Planning (CAMP) workshop organized by Medicinal Plants Conservation Centre, Environment
Protection Training and Research Institute,
Conservation
Assessment and Management Planning (CAMP) workshop was held from 9th
to
ANDHRA PRADESH: STUDY AREA
The State of Andhra Pradesh (The land of Telugu people) is situated in the middle of
eastern half of the Indian Peninsula lying between 12o 41' – 19o
54' N latitudes and 76o 46' – 84o 45' E longitudes. It is
bounded by the
Administratively, Andhra Pradesh has 23
districts which were grouped into three zones: (1) Circars or Coastal Andhra
with nine distrcts, i.e. East Godavari, Guntur, Krishna, Nellore, Prakasam,
Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam and West Godavari (2) Rayalaseema with four Ceded districts,
i.e. Anantapur, Chittoor, Cuddapah and Kurnool
(3) Telangana (Deccan or
erstwhile Nizam's Dominions of Hyderabad State) with 10 districts, i.e.
Adilabad, Hyderabad, Karimnagar, Khammam, Mahabubnagar, Medak, Nalgonda,
Nizamabad, Rangareddy and Warangal.
Geographically,
the State is categorized into three regions, namely: (1) the Coastal Plains (along the east coast, a
low-lying area from from Srikakulam to Nellore) mainly of agricultural land,
(2) the Eastern Ghats, forming a
chain of discontinuous range of hills along the coast with good vegetation, and
(3) the Deccan Plateau consisting of
agricultural lands, scrub and deciduous forests, which cover part of Kurnool
(excl. Nallamalais), Anantapur districts and the whole of Telangana.
The wide range of topography and other
physical features of the State, provided by the hills rising from almost sea
level to about 1500 m altitude, shaped the land to harbour rich and varied
flora. In Andhra Pradesh, vegetation cover occupies 23.03% of the total
geographical area of 275, 068 sq. km (Reddy et al. 2008). The forests in
the State are broadly classified into Dry deciduous, Moist deciduous and
Semi-evergreen types. Besides, there are mangroves, other subsidiary and serial
types spread over limited areas (Reddy, 2007).
METHODOLOGY
Initially, 101
medicinal plants of conservation concern were identified with the help of eminent
botanists and field researchers of Andhra Pradesh and FRLHT,
The workshop
deliberations involved preparation of data sheets for each selected species.
This was facilitated by the formation of 5 different working groups, each
consisting of eminent botanists from Andhra Pradesh as well as representatives
of BSI, NBPGR, user groups and forest managers. Each working group was assigned
10 taxa for assessment. The taxon data sheets filled up by one group were
reviewed by other working groups and finalized in the final plenary session
which provided opportunity to each participant to contribute and or modify the
details filled in each taxon sheet.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Out of the 50
medicinal plants assessed during the workshop 12 are endemic to
More than 40
participants form 10 different Research Institutions like Botanical Survey of India,
Universities, Colleges and Forest Department participated in this three day
CAMP deliberation which involved the assessment of taxon data sheets. The
participants included eminent botanists, field botanists, wildlife managers,
ecologists and scientists from various academic communities, students of
botany, ayurvedic physicians and even folk botanists. To mention a few, eminent
botanists like Dr. M.P. Nayar, Prof. Rolla Seshagiri Rao, Dr. J.L. Ellis, Dr.
K. Hemadri, Prof. Vatsavaya S. Raju, Prof. R.R. Venkata Raju, Prof. T.
Pullaiah, Prof. P.N. Rao, Dr. R. Venkateshwar Reddy, Dr. N. Ramarao, Dr. K.
Ravikumar, Dr. B. Suryanarayana, Prof. Y.N.R.
Varma, Dr. N. Venugopal and also folk practitioners like Mr. Bodd Reddy, Mr.
Linga Reddy, Mr. Ganapathi & Mr. Sree Ramulu and Forest officials Mr. K.S.
Rao IFS, Chief Conservator of Forests, Mr.C. Shivshankar Reddy IFS, Chief
Conservator of Forests, attended the workshop. The Chief guests were Mr. K.
Subba Rao, IFS, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests of Andhra Pradesh, Mr.
R. Rajamani, IAS, Retired Union Secretary of Ministry of Environment and
Forests and Ms. Gayathri Ramachandran, IAS, Director General, Environment
Protection Training & Research Institute (EPTRI).
It can be
concluded that out of the 50 taxa, which were assessed during the workshop, 39
fall into threatened group (Table 1). These have been further assigned Red List
status of Critically Endangered (4), Endangered (24) and Vulnerable (11);
highlighting the pressing need for urgent conservation action. Such CAMP
workshops highlight the need for the application of intensive management
techniques for medicinal plant species threatened with extinction (Reddy et al. 2001; Jadhav et al. 2001).
Table 1. Threat Status of Assessed (Red listed) Medicinal
Plant Species.
|
Sl. |
Species
|
IUCN Status |
Criteria based on
presence in the region
|
Estd. Proportion of global presence in the region |
|
1 |
Acorus
calamus |
Endangered |
B2 a, b(iii) |
<1 % |
|
2 |
Aegle
marmelos |
Vulnerable |
A2 c,d |
2 - 5% |
|
3 |
Amorphophallus
sylvaticus |
Vulnerable |
A2 c |
5 - 10% |
|
4 |
Angiopteris
evecta |
Endangered |
B1a,b (iii,v) & B2 a,b (iii,v) |
1 - 2 % |
|
5 |
Anodendron
paniculatum |
Endangered |
B2 a,b (iii, v) |
0.5 - 1% |
|
6 |
Boswellia
ovalifoliolata |
Endangered (Globally) |
B1 & B2 a,b(iii, v) |
100% |
|
7 |
Butea
monosperma var. lutea |
Endangered (Globally) |
A2 c,d / D |
30-40% |
|
8 |
Celastrus
paniculatus |
Near Threatened |
|
2 - 3% |
|
9 |
Chlorophytum
arundinaceum |
Least Concerned |
|
< 1% |
|
10 |
Plectranthus
barbatus |
Endangered |
B2 a,b (iii) |
< 1% |
|
11 |
Costus
speciosus |
Near Threatened |
A2 c,d |
2 - 5% |
|
12 |
Cycas
beddomei |
Critically Endangered (Globally) |
B1 a,b (ii,iii,iv,v) |
100% |
|
13 |
Decalepis
hamiltonii |
Endangered (Globally) |
A2 c,d |
40 - 50% |
|
14 |
Embelia
ribes |
Critically Endangered |
B1&2 a,b(iii), D |
<1% |
|
15 |
Entada
pursaetha |
Endangered |
B2 a,b (ii, iii) |
< 1% |
|
16 |
Euphorbia
fusiformis |
Vulnerable |
A2 c,d |
2 - 5% |
|
17 |
Gloriosa
superba |
Vulnerable |
A2 d |
0.5 - 1% |
|
18 |
Gymnema
sylvestre |
Vulnerable |
A2 c,d |
2 - 5% |
|
19 |
Hildegardia
populifolia |
Vulnerable (Globally) |
A2 c,d |
80 - 90% |
|
20 |
Holostemma
ada-kodien |
Near Threatened |
|
2 - 3% |
|
21 |
Lasia
spinosa |
Endangered |
B1&B2 a,b(iii, iv,v) |
<1% |
|
22 |
Litsea
glutinosa |
Critically Endangered |
A2 c,d |
0.5 - 1% |
|
23 |
Merremia
turpethum |
Least Concerned |
|
2 - 5% |
|
24 |
Mesua
ferrea |
Not Evaluated |
|
<1% |
|
25 |
Nervilia
aragoana |
Endangered |
A2 c / B2 a, b (ii, iii, iv) |
<1% |
|
26 |
Oroxylum
indicum |
Vulnerable |
A2 c,d |
3 - 5% |
|
27 |
Paederia
foetida |
Near Threatened |
|
<1% |
|
28 |
Phyllanthus
indofischeri |
Vulnerable (Globally) |
A2 c |
25 - 30% |
|
29 |
Pimpinella
tirupatiensis |
Endangered (Globally) |
B1&2 a,b (ii,iii) |
100% |
|
30 |
Piper
nigrum |
Endangered |
B2 a,b(ii) |
<1% |
|
31 |
Plumbago
indica |
Endangered |
B2 a,b (iii) |
<1% |
|
32 |
Pterocarpus
santalinus |
Endangered (Globally) |
A4 c,d |
> 90% |
|
33 |
Pueraria
tuberosa |
Near Threatened |
|
5-10% |
|
34 |
Rauvolfia
serpentina |
Critically Endangered |
A2 c,d |
2 - 5% |
|
35 |
Rhaphidophora
decursiva |
Endangered |
B1 & B2 a,b(iii) |
<1% |
|
36 |
Rubia
cordifolia |
Vulnerable |
A2 c |
< 2% |
|
37 |
Santalum
album |
Endangered |
A2 c,d |
2 - 5% |
|
38 |
Saraca
asoca |
Endangered |
B2 a,b(iii) |
<2% |
|
39 |
Shorea
robusta |
Near Threatened |
|